
Handling time
The watch as an extension of the body
How do we interact with the technical objects that are part of our everyday lives? Opening a car door, turning on the light, adjusting the flow and temperature of the shower, unlocking a mobile phone – we turn, push, press, pull and touch, often without a second thought. The relationship between human and machine, hand and tool, mind and technology, are rich and complex, yet rarely discussed. The most perfectly ergonomic objects are almost invisible, seamlessly becoming extensions of our bodies. This is the achievement of countless engineers who strive daily to create systems so natural and fluid that we forget their complexity.
For a mechanical watch, this question is especially crucial. The object is small, its inner workings extremely delicate, and its limited energy is drawn from our movements. In many ways, a watch is like a living organism, dependent on us to function.
Winding the mechanism, setting the time and date, activating the chronograph – all these actions require direct interaction with the watch’s mechanics. Watchmakers know that even the slightest mishap can damage the heart of the timepiece. Over centuries, they have designed and refined ever more ergonomic solutions, seeking to minimise risk while balancing protection and accessibility – a near impossible challenge.
Prior to the advent of water-resistant and shock-resistant watches in the 20th century, users had to assume the role of watchmaker. Winding the mechanism meant opening the case, inserting a tiny key, and turning it with care. Sometimes, a tiny wooden stick was needed to push a lever inside the movement. Watches were strictly shielded from water and humidity, and the slightest shock could break the balance staff.
Industrialisation changed everything. While the mechanism remains delicate, it is now better protected. Yet new challenges arise: how to turn a crown without compromising water resistance? How to easily set the date, day, month and moon phase of a perpetual calendar? Innovations continue to flourish, and Audemars Piguet is at the forefront of this ongoing quest for ergonomic excellence.
The original key
For centuries, winding clocks and watches required the use of keys.
A winding key is a small component held between the thumb and forefinger, with a square-shaped opening at one end. Watches, in turn, feature small pins shaped to fit the key. By inserting the key into the opening, the user could engage with its mechanisms – winding the mainspring or setting the hands to the correct time.
From a watchmaking perspective, this system offered simplicity. Yet it also exposed the movement to risk: dust could easily infiltrate the gears, and using the key required dexterity and keen eyesight – no small feat, given the limited technology at the time. Not to mention the fact that keys themselves are prone to wear and loss.
It is often overlooked that it was precisely these drawbacks that inspired pioneering watchmakers such as Abraham Louis Perrelet, Hubert Sarton and Abraham-Louis Breguet to develop the first self-winding watches in the 1770s. With these “montres à secousses” or “perpetual” watches, users no longer needed direct access to the mechanism – a gentle shake was enough to wind the movement. Time-setting, however, still required a key, now inserted on the dial side to adjust the hands.
Ultimately, this system fell out of favour. As Alfred Chapuis explains in The History of the Self-Winding Watch, its decline after the 1830s was due to complexity, fragility, and the high cost of early selfwinding models. It should also be noted that a watch moves less in a pocket than when worn on the wrist, limiting the effectiveness of early automatic winding.
The crown: a technical conquest
With Europe’s industrialisation in the 19th century, watches became indispensable companions of modern life. Yet winding keys proved increasingly problematic. Replacing them with a crown might seem straightforward, but to implement this idea, watchmakers had to invent additional mechanisms capable of controlling two distinct functions: winding and setting the time.
For a time, two systems coexisted. The technically simpler was the “push-piece” winding mechanism, which combined a crown and a small push-piece beside it. To wind the watch, the user simply turned the crown; to set the time, one pressed the push-piece while turning the crown.
More ergonomic was the “pull-piece” winding system, which concentrated all functions within the crown. As its name suggests, the user simply pulled the crown out to switch from one function to another. Though more complex to manufacture than the push-piece system, it took longer to become widespread.
The most significant inventions emerged in the first half of the 19th century. Among the many watchmakers involved were John Roger Arnold (1820) and the Breguet workshops (1830). The Vallée de Joux played an active role, notably with Hector Audemars’ system in 1838 and those of Adolphe Nicole and Antoine LeCoultre in 1846 and 1847, respectively.
However, the inventor who had the greatest impact on the development of the winding crown (then called the “knob”) was Frenchman Adrien Philippe. In his book Les Montres sans clé (Watches without Keys), published in 1863, he recounts seeing a crown-wound watch made by Louis Audemars in 1842. Fascinated, Philippe developed his own pull-out winding system – a mechanism so sophisticated that it caught the attention of Antoine Norbert de Patek, leading to the formation of Patek Philippe.
The crown – a question of style!
From its very introduction, the crown became a defining stylistic element of the watch. Its shape, its subtlety – or conversely, its expressiveness – and the depth of its serrations speak volumes about a watch’s identity. That said, a crown is never considered in isolation; its design is always in harmony with the watch as a whole.
The very first crowns were nestled inside the bow of the pocket watch – the small loop used to attach the watch to a chain – a position that seemed pre-destined. Initially these crowns were small, thin discs, but they quickly grew in size and volume, becoming both more visible and more ergonomic.
The arrival of wristwatches changed the rules of the game, particularly as these new timepieces no longer featured a bow. In the 1920s, crowns often became more refined, sometimes blending into the watch case. This quest for absolute discretion even led to the crown being concealed in some instances: some hidden beneath the caseback (a configuration known as the remontoir dessous ) others tucked under the bezel, particularly in jewellery watches.
Contrary to this trend, the 20th century also saw a shift towards making the crown a prominent aesthetic feature. Sometimes enhanced with a cabochon, engraved with a logo, or covered in rubber, the crown grew beyond its purely functional role. A striking example is the crown of the first Royal Oak watches, described here.
Push-pieces
Pressing a button to activate a function – a simple gesture that connects human to machine. Whether calling a lift, turning on a light, opening the cover of a pocket watch, this intuitive interaction is central to our daily lives. In watchmaking, this button is known as the push-piece, a component that comes in many forms and activates a wide range of functions.
On early chiming pocket watches, the chime was often triggered by pressing firmly on the bow or by pressing a semi-rotational knob set within it (see illustrations). Additional push-pieces on case sides allowed users to adjust the date, moon phase, or time zones.
But it was with the advent of the chronograph that the push-piece truly came into its own. The first monopoussoir (single-push-piece) mechanisms used one button to successively start, stop and reset the chronograph. In the 20th century, a second push-piece was introduced – one to start and stop, the other to reset – marking a new era in functional design.
Push-pieces vary in form and function – sometimes integrated into the crown for discretion, sometimes oversized to assert their presence. Their design balances utility with aesthetics.
Depending on the function they trigger, push-pieces require varying degrees of energy. The user-friendliness is integral to horological excellence. The force required to activate them, the smoothness of their movement, their travel (depth), dimensions, surface finish, and synchronisation with the movement – all are critical indicators of quality.
Their vulnerability, however, should not be overlooked. A shock to a push-piece or crown can spread to the heart of the mechanism and cause serious damage. To mitigate this, some watches feature protective guards, designed to absorb impact while preserving access. In some models, these guards swivel to fully cover the push-pieces, ensuring optimal protection.
Levers, pull-out pieces and more
“Tire la chevillette, la bobinette cherra“ is how the grandmother’s door opens in Perraut’s Little Red Riding Hood, written in 1697 - roughly translating to «pull the pin, and the latch will fall. Such phrases, at once technical and a touch mysterious, are beloved in watchmaking. Alongside crowns and push-pieces, some timepieces are equipped with pull-out pieces, latches, sliding bolts, secret levers and even swivelling bows.
The most famous of these mechanisms is undoubtedly the trigger-piece on chiming watches. It requires a certain amount of dexterity to slide – while holding the watch firmly in one hand, careful not to press the glass – the other hand must slide the latch using a fingertip or nail. A bit of force is needed to wind the spring, which then activate the chime. Once released, the watch melodiously announces the time.
Another important mechanism is the lever, a key feature in many pocket watches. It can serve several functions, such as selecting the chiming mode – Petite Sonnerie, Grande Sonnerie or silent. On certain older models, a small lever placed on the bezel allowed the user to set the time via the crown. In savonette (hunter) pocket watches, closing the cover automatically returns the lever to its original position, preventing accidental time setting. A clever solution!
Specialities
The more functions a watch has, the more activation and adjustment elements it requires. So how can aesthetic harmony be preserved? How can the case remain free of visible push-pieces, crowns and levers? Watchmakers understood early on the importance of arranging these mechanisms according to their frequency of use. The secret to true ergonomics is in making rarely used components discreet – without compromising ease of access.
To open the cover of a pocket watch, watchmakers almost always placed a push-piece within the crown-integrated bow. However, chronograph pocket watches often used that same position to activate the chronograph. So, what happens when a pocket watch serves both purposes?
Should a separate push-piece be added, at the risk of having to redesign the entire watch mechanism? Or should both functions be combined in the same place, without the act of opening of the cover inadvertently triggering the chronograph?
This short chapter explores a few ingenious solutions found in select timepieces from the Audemars Piguet Heritage Collection. These technical innovations showcase he boundless creativity of watchmakers – masters of reconciling complexity with elegance.
Water resistance and protection
Push-pieces and crowns connect the exterior to the interior of a watch – much like our ears, mouths and eyes connect us to the world. They are essential interfaces, yet inherently vulnerable, as they can also allow unwanted elements to enter. Unlike the human body, watches have no antibodies to defend themselves against intruders.
From the late 19th century onwards, a number of inventions were developed to protect these sensitive components. In 1883, Alcide Droz & Fils filed a patent for dust-proof watches. Forty years later, in 1923, John Harwood presented the first water-resistant, crown-free selfwinding watch, which was set by rotating the bezel. At the time, the most common way to protect watches from dust and moisture was to screw the components together – a reliable system, provided each component was perfectly calibrated. The screw-down crown on the Rolex Oyster is undoubtedly the most famous example.
Today, water resistance often relies on synthetic rubber seals. Though first patented in 1897 (CH13807), their widespread use only began in the 1930s and 1940s.
Initially reserved for sports watches, water resistance gradually extended to classic timepieces by the 1940s. Not having to remove your watch to wash your hands is undeniably practical! In 1972, these two worlds came together with the Royal Oak 5402: a luxury sports watch water-resistant to 10 ATM (100 metres). Its water resistance was achieved through a combination of screw-down and gasket systems. For more, see the dedicated article on the Royal Oak case.
Forbidden corrections
Water resistance is not the only challenge posed by crowns and push-pieces. Another critical concern for watchmakers is untimely adjustments – interventions made while delicate mechanical operations are underway. These can cause serious damage to the movement.
For instance, setting the date on a 1920s calendar watch while a tiny pin is actively advancing the date or moon phase forward can easily break the mechanism. Over the past half-century, systems have become more secure, but caution remains essential. The golden rule: never force a corrector. If it resists, it’s not the right moment to operate it.
In the absence of a user manual, a simple method is to turn the hands through a full 24-hour cycle and observe when the indications change. Then, make adjustments at the opposite time, so if the date jumps at 23:45, it is safest to use the corrector around midday.
Another forbidden adjustment is setting the time on a minute repeater while it is chiming. This can damage key components such as the minute wheel, the beak of the minutes piece, or the striking studs.
But how can users be aware of these golden rules? For striking watches, watchmakers have long relied on the owner’s horological knowledge, the salesperson’s guidance, or careful reading of the instruction manual. Yet, unfortunate mishandlings still occur.
In 2016, Audemars Piguet introduced a unique safety feature: when the watch is chiming, it becomes almost impossible to pull out the crown to set the time. This discreet innovation protects the movement without affecting user experience.
Such safety features are important steps in the quest for ergonomics. They are rarely communicated, barely noticeable to the wearer and yet essential. As in other fields, ergonomics only becomes noticeable when it is lacking. A well-designed chair moulds itself to the shape of the body so seamlessly that one forgets it is there. The same is true of a well-designed watch.
Calendar adjustments
Perpetual calendar watches are a particularly interesting example. This highly valued complication was designed to display the correct date for at least a century, accounting for the varying lengths of months – 30 31, 28 – and even February 29 every four years.
Yet many owners of perpetual calendar watches also own multiple timepieces. Unless it is a selfwinding model kept running on a watch winder, it will eventually stop when worn. As a result, the calendar indications must be corrected each time it is restarted – a task that demands time, dexterity and technical understanding.
Manual adjustment begins with locating the discreet correctors on the case middle – often tiny, and sometimes up to five. Using the supplied tool, each corrector must be activated in a specific order, the correct number of times, and with care to avoid slipping, at the risk of scratching the case. Ironically, it is rare for a perpetual calendar watch to display the correct date – despite being designed to do so for a century.
To mark its 150th anniversary, Audemars Piguet developed a simple and intuitive all-in-one crown correction system. This innovation allows users to adjust all calendar indications, set the time, and wind the watch using only the crown. Inside, several mechanisms interact depending on the crown’s rotation and pull-out position, offering four distinct configurations. While the explanation may seem complex, the operation is remarkably smooth.
With this system, one can safely bet that perpetual calendars will now show the correct date far more often.
RD#5 push-pieces
Since its invention in the 19th century, the chronograph has undergone numerous technical developments – split-seconds hands, jumping seconds, column wheels, cams, vertical clutches, flyback functions, selfwinding systems and laptimers. Each innovation has enriched this emblematic complication.
However, one element remained unchanged: the reset function. The force and precision required to return all hands to 12 o'clock in a fraction of a second is colossal – especially considering the scale. Patented by Adolphe Nicole in 1844, the traditional system relies on a hammer striking a heart-shaped cam, instantly rotating it back to zero when the push-piece is pressed.
In the late 2010s, Audemars Piguet began to rethink the push-piece itself: could it be smaller, more sensitive – like a smartphone button? In short, more ergonomic. One conclusion quickly became clear - the system inherited from Nicole needed a complete reimagining.
On the Royal Oak “Jumbo” Selfwinding Flying Tourbillon Extra-Thin Chronograph RD#5, the reset mechanism works differently. Behind the low-travel, low-force push-pieces winds a small spring that tightens as the chronograph hands advance. When the push-piece is pressed, the stored energy is released, instantly resetting the hands – without requiring additional force. Imagine a child on a swing. Once pulled back, he or she will swing forward effortlessly when released. This new chronograph works in the same way – energy is stored in advance and then released at the right moment.
Smaller, more responsive and requiring less force, the new push-piece marks a major leap forward. What might seem like a minor refinement, is, in fact, a major innovation – one that opens a new chapter in the history of the chronograph.
Both simple and complicated
The perceived simplicity of a watch can sometimes conceal extraordinary mechanical complexity.
Unveiled in 2023, the Code 11.59 by Audemars Piguet Ultra-Complication Universelle RD#4 is one of the most complicated watches in the world, with 40 functions, including 23 complications. This monumental undertaking mobilised five watchmakers, dozens of specialists, and required seven years of development.
The aim was to create the most user-friendly and ergonomic ultra-complicated watch ever made. With a diameter under 42 mm, a weight of less than 180 g, and a remarkably legible dial grouping all calendar indications into apertures, this watch marks a milestone in the quest for ergonomic excellence.
Three crowns and three push-pieces are all that are needed to set all its functions. Each crown controls several different functions and is connected to a considerable number of components. Their sophisticated design has earned them the nickname “super crowns”. Take the one at 4 o'clock, for example, which controls four distinct functions:
• Advancing the month in sync with the year (clockwise rotation),
• Reversing the month in sync with the year (counterclockwise rotation),
• Flyback of the running chronograph (a press),
• Resetting the stopped chronograph (a press).
To secure the system, the chronograph cannot be activated while calendar corrections are underway.
Integrating so many functions into such a small space demanded exceptional ingenuity. The split-seconds mechanism was positioned at the same level as the oscillating weight to save thickness, and the dial itself serves as a bridge. The number of components was also reduced, with the movement performing all functions using just over 1,100 components.
The name of this timepiece pays tribute to the 1899 "Universelle” pocket watch, a masterpiece featuring 19 complications. Weighing 600 grams, it incorporated 14 adjustment devices, including a crown, a trigger-piece, six levers and six push-pieces. Designed to showcase technical mastery, it was never intended for daily wear. Today, it is on display at the Musée Atelier Audemars Piguet.
A new family of complications
Up until the late 19th century, innovation in watchmaking focused mainly on complications and precision. But with the advent of the wristwatch, a new frontier emerged: ergonomics. Water resistance, autonomy, automatic winding, shock resistance, lightness, legibility, acoustic quality – and, above, user friendliness.
Giulio Papi, Director of Watch Conception at Audemars Piguet, is advocating for the formal recognition of a new category of complications dedicated to ergonomics.
"To encourage the adoption of innovative ideas, we could collaborate with watchmaking cultural committees to create – alongside existing categories such as chronometric precision, astronomy, time-measuring functions and automata – a new category of complications: mechanised ergonomics. Although this represents a major challenge, the initiative could enrich the watchmaking landscape at an academic level and open up new creative perspectives for future generations. "
Behind this proposal lies a conviction: that the considerable technical innovations enhancing the user experience deserve visibility and recognition equal to those that push the boundaries of time measurement. For while ergonomics is often invisible, it is essential.
Audemars Piguet Heritage Team, October 2025





































































































